| |
1. |
Abu-Ghannam, B.J. & Shaw, R., 1980. Natural transition of boundary layers-the effects of turbulence, pressure gradient, and flow history. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 22(5), pp.213-228.
|
2. |
Baltazar, J., Rijpkema, D., & de Campos, J.F., 2018. On the use of the γ-Reθt transition model for the prediction of the propeller performance at model-scale. Ocean Engineering, 170, pp.6-19.
|
3. |
Bhattacharyya, A., Krasilnikov, V., & Steen, S., 2016. Scale effects on open water characteristics of a controllable pitch propeller working within different duct designs. Ocean Engineering, 112, pp.226-242.
|
4. |
Castelli, E.B., Raciti, M. & Grandi, G., 2012. Numerical analysis of laminar to turbulent transition on the DU91-W2-250 airfoil. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. |
5. |
Coupland, J., 1990. Special interest group on laminar to turbulent transition and retransition: T3A and T3B test cases. European Research Community On Flow, Turbulence And Combustion TR A, 309514. |
6. |
ITTC, 1993. Final report of the propulsor committee. Proceedings of the 20th ITTC, San Francisco, California, 19-25 September 1993. |
7. |
Janssen, R.F., 2015. The influence of laminar-turbulent transition on the perfomance of a propeller. TU Delft University. |
8. |
Joung, T.H., Jeong, S.J. & Lee, S.K., 2014. CFD simulations and experimental tests for three different ducted propellers. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 28(3), pp.199-208.
|
9. |
Juhaveikko, A.J., 2001. CFD simulations of a turbulent flow over flat plate. Aalto University MEMO No CFD/THERMO-36-2001. |
10. |
Kuiper, G., 1981. Cavitation inception on ship propeller models. Netherlands Ship Model Basin, Publ. No. 655. |
11. |
Langtry, R.B., & Menter, F.R., 2009. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes. AIAA journal, 47(12), pp.2894-2906.
|
12. |
Lee, S.B., 2018. Direct numerical and large eddy simulations of transitional flows around turbulence stimulators at very low speeds. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 55(3), pp.265-273.
|
13. |
Menter, F.R., Langtry, R.B., Likki, S.R., Suzen, Y.B., Huang, P.G. & Völker, S., 2006. A correlation-based transition model using local variables-part I: model formulation. Journal of turbomachinery, 128(3), pp.413-422.
|
14. |
Sasajima, T., 1975. A study on the propeller surface flow in open and behind condition. 14th ITTC, Contribution to Performance Committee. |
15. |
Seo, S.U. & Park S.H., 2017. Numerical simulations of added resistance and motions of KCS in regular head waves. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 54(2), pp.132-142.
|
16. |
Seok, J. & Park, J.C., 2020. Numerical simulation of resistance performance according to surface roughness in container ships. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 12, pp.11-19.
|
17. |
Suh, S.B., 2017. CFD analysis of performance of KRISO devices (K-DUCT) for propulsion efficiency improvement. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 31(3), pp.183-188. |
18. |
Tsuda, T., Konishi, S., Asano, S., Ogawa, K. & Hayasaki, K., 1978. Effect of propeller Reynolds number on self-propulsion performance. Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineering, 169. |
19. |
Wang, C. & Perot, B., 2002. Prediction of turbulent transition in boundary layers using the turbulent potential model. Journal of Turbulence, 3(1), pp.1-15.
|
20. |
Wang, X. & Walters, K., 2012. Computational analysis of marine-propeller performance using transition-sensitive turbulence modeling. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 134(7), 071107.
|
21. |
White, F.M., 2003. Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill. |
22. |
Yang, H.U., Kim, B.N., Yoo, J.H. & Kim, W.J., 2010. Wake comparison between model and full scale ships using CFD. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea, 47(2), pp.150-162.
|
23. |
Yongxing, Z. & Kim, D.J., 2020. Optimization approach for a catamaran hull using CAESES and STAR-CCM+. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology, 34(4), pp.272-276.
|